🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding the remarks delivered by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler after Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the New York major quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was appropriate. Rather, he brought up the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if the American defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven grand slams (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Djokovic in the next round). He said in press following his defeat that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. He is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else sensibly had the drought of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is ranked fourth in the world starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that is as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and concussive strength on each front side and backhand are more than adequate to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is often overmatched. The last several years has seen the interesting rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and grace of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

Fritz has made a number of dramatic, unexpected advancements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that very last eight match should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four sets, a win that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a few match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous chances to break. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a terrible service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and forced him to expend far too much effort to prevail. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of Djokovic, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he would.

The American is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, exceeding virtually anyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not just express his emotions or the strategy he believed determined a match, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz told a journalist in the summer of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly unlikely for everybody else. {